The amount of the peak and the destiefs obviously varies from case to case and reflects the strength of each party`s case and the risk aversion of each party. After several years of prosecution in a case, a complainant may want to rely on at least some money. In exchange, the complainant must give up any hope of ”great blow.” The defendant may have to pay a certain amount, even in a case where liability is questionable to avoid the prospect of a huge judgment. Insurers may be interested in avoiding the possibility of a bad faith claim from their policyholders if the jury`s judgment exceeds the insurance limits. Some lawyers avoid very low agreements and prefer to reach traditional regulations with a number. This type of solution is immediate – no matter how far a traditional agreement is reached, the jury will be dismissed and dismissed. The complainant`s lawyer returns to the office to work on other cases. Defence counsel is doing the same thing. Customers avoid the cost for more days of the trial period. A traditional colony requires a vocation and ensures cost security. The role of a defence lawyer is to assess liability and decide with the client and the insurance whether an action should be defended or settled. Even if a decision is made to resolve the case, we can, for strategic reasons, continue the discovery until the count is possible. If a decision is made to defend the case, we will go with the discovery until the time of trial.
In the decency of the trial, we will again be evaluated with the case to determine the chances of success. This assessment focuses not only on liability, but also on damage. If the case is presented with a strong defense of liability, but a sympathetic plaintiff and high damages, the concern is excessive judgment across political boundaries. The following case study serves as an example: in our system of adversarial medical responsibility, neither party can reliably rely on the generosity of the adversary to obtain a financial settlement that preserves the professional reputation and personal fortune of the physician and gives the injured patient the opportunity to rebuild his life comfortably. Distrust and discord have led some physicians to practice different systems to discourage lawyers from following comparisons or premiums outside their health insurance limits.